Posted by Kimberly Krautter on August 15, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Yesterday, I received a provocative email from my dear friend Bruce Taub. He posed a question that I'd like to share with my long neglected readers.
THE QUESTION:
Many of us on the political left carry on our dialogue and our socio-political activism regarding Israel/Palestine in the belief that the state of Israel must be a non-racist, non-imperialist, non-ethnic cleansing entity, and, for those of us who are Jewish, that Jews are expected to act in conformity with a high standard of political, social, and moral behavior. The counterpoint is often succinctly stated as, "Well that's all fine and good, but it remains an absolute reality that continues today, as it has across the centuries, there are people who want to wipe the Jews off the face of the earth."
Do "we" believe there are those who wish to wipe Jews off the face of the earth? Do you believe it? To what extent is it a threat that matters? To what extent do we -- ought we -- consider it in the political positions we advocate and political choices we make?
What is the meaning/consequence for us on the left that many Jews do believe it... and for excellent precedential historical reasons?
MY RESPONSE:
I cannot respond as a Jew, for I am not, but I believe the answer lies in exploring a similar question I have asked often in the last few years: Are we American enough? Do we dare to act on the ideals of freedom, personal liberty and just cause that our Founders took such pain to craft in our Constitution? Do we have the courage of our convictions to "be American" in the world?
Our elected representatives and administrative governments act on our behalf because that is how our system is wrought. They respond to we the people. I believe our current collective state of angst and ambivalence is rooted in our corporate mindset -- one that at the same time has brought us great prosperity and great degradation.
Our government responds to "we the corporation," because in the 20th century, we reorganized our society under the corporate structure. Instead of framing our ideals and acting from the standpoint of "what is good for me is good for the community," (which is the orientation that leads from the ideal of personal freedom), we have been acting from the standpoint of, "what is good for the business is good for me because that business keeps me afloat."
Both frames of reference are myopic, but the difference is that the latter subjugates us. We fought for independence to liberate us from subjects to become citizens.
Citizenship is the cornerstone of our Republic. Citizenship demands active engagement. If "corporate citizens" are the only ones coalescing to petition our government, then we get the imperialism we currently experience at home and abroad.
Corporate citizens use the lazy fuel of money to channel their voices and produce influence. I submit to you, my friends, that we the people -- the flesh and blood citizens of our great nation -- have plenty of evidence (and recent personal experience) that when we have the courage to coalesce and give voice, we can compete with the corporate interests to demand restraint and resolve to put Americanism first.
A good example of how we are second class citizens to our corporate counterparts is that we the people can no longer declare bankruptcy and be forgiven our debts. Yet corporations have been granted even greater power to declare bankruptcy, our government will even pay for their debts, and they are licensed to rob the pensions to keep the company operational through that period. Have we forgotten that pensions are not a "benefit," they are in fact a part of the compensation package -- what is PAID to employees in lieu of cash. How would we react if our weekly checks were suddenly 15% or more less? For some reason, in all of the public debate on this issue, this little factoid has never been raised on either side.
When we the people forget our own place and power in the process, we end up in the red -- literally and figuratively.
The larger question is one of balance. This is why lady Justice is one of our great American symbols. Let us resolve in this year and in this century to balance our interests.
I believe, my dear friend Bruce, that this is the answer to your inquiry as well.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on December 18, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Today I share two uniquely American stories. The juxtaposition says a lot about us as a country. You could say our national mirror has two faces. Both reflections are accurate. Both speak to our celebrated indomitable spirit. One is tragic. Both are uplifting. In the aftermath of the hurricanes, many people will relate to these stories. I want to thank my friend and coach Randy Siegel for allowing me to reprint his "Manifesto for Life" in this entry today. I think it is a fitting tribute to the memory of my friend Cathy who died this week and who embodied the values and attributes in Siegel's "Manifesto". First, a few paragraphs about Cathy...
Catherine Tygart Vecchio was a young woman, only 46, who could not overcome complications from hypertension and other chronic diseases. Ultimately pancreatitis took her away from this world. Cathy embodied the indomitable spirit of America. I met her only two years ago. She and her husband Joe were a striking pair; very bright, educated, intelligent, and industrious. Joe served in the military. Cathy and Joe married just five years ago. Cathy had two adorable children. She encouraged their quest for learning and their creative instincts. The family laughed heartily together every day.
The very first day I met Joe, after he impressed our group of grassroots activists with some unique political and social insights, he shared some shocking news: Joe was unemployed. His unemployment benefits were running out in a few days, and he and his family were facing eviction and homelessness. Needless to say, we were dumbstruck. How could such bright, capable, non-drug addicted people be in this condition? In America?
The tragic fact is that during the last two years of Cathy's life, she and Joe lived in a different America than you and I. They did fall into homelessness and suffered the humiliation of trying to wade through the red tape of our dysfunctional social services. She lost her children to an ex-husband in another state because she had to ensure their security while she and Joe worked through their troubles. They were just starting to regain a foothold into the America where you and I live when she was struck down by illness. Of course, they were uninsured, a fact that not only limited the quality of care she could receive, (and quite possibly led to her untimely death because her illness could not be properly managed), but also threw the couple back into unemployment and near homelessness.
Although Cathy died in a condition that most of us cannot imagine, she was able to smile and laugh and persevere. She was down but never defeated.
A Manifesto for Living, By Randy Siegel www.powerhousecommunications.com
(Randy composed this reflection as a tribute to his brother Chip who died on July 21, 2004. It was originally published by the Asheville Citizen Times.)
Death is only a whisper away, and still it calls out to us to live life fully. Later this month, I turn 49, and no longer will I take my life for granted. When my time comes, I will have few regrets. The time to live my life is now.
Seven years ago, I signed a living will, but what is my will for living? How do I want to live my life?
With you as my witnesses, I want to declare my “Manifesto for Living.” It contains only four elements.
One: Live for Love. Nothing is more important than love. Love is the juice of life; it is what gives us energy. I will put the relationships in my life first – above career, above my art, above all else. I will seek to see the divinity in everyone I meet. In their eyes I will find God and love.
Two: Let Go and Let God. In Al-Anon, they have a saying (borrowed from Alcoholics Anonymous), “Let go and let God.” Even though I know the wisdom of these words, I still struggle with making them come alive in my life. My head tells me: “Surrender is for sissies.” My ego repeats, “To survive in the world takes nothing short of sheer force of will.” But my heart tells me something different. It tells me there is a Higher Power, and if I learn to trust it, it will guide me.
I am learning I cannot control life. Many situations are out of my control. Instead of becoming vested in specific outcomes I can only trust that what will be, will be.
The Serenity Prayer offers this guidance: “God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can and wisdom to know the difference.” I repeat it often.
Three: Live in Gratitude. A banner hangs in my church that quotes spiritual leader Meister Eckhart: “If the only prayer you say in your whole life is ‘thank you’ that would suffice.” Several months ago, I began the practice of beginning each day listing three things (or people) for which (or whom) I am grateful. When I remember to do it, I seem to have a brighter day.
According to the law of attraction, we attract that on which we focus. When my thoughts dwell on what I don’t have in my life, I attract unsettling feelings of need. The tapes in my head start to whine, “You are not enough. There is not enough.” But when I shift my focus from what I don’t have to what I do, I come from a place of abundance. The tapes stop, and beautiful music fills my ears.
I am learning to seek gratitude in every situation, even those that I once considered “bad.” Dr. Wayne Dyer, in his book The Power of Intention: Learning to Co-Create Your World Your Way, writes, “To connectors, everything that shows up in their life is there because the power of intention intended it there. So they’re always in a state of gratitude. They feel thankful for everything, even things that seem to be obstacles… Through their thanks, they honor all possibilities…”
Four: Follow My Energy. Yesterday, my analyst posed the question: “What would your life be like if you were to simply follow your energy?” In his question, I found a compass for my calling.
Whether called energy, enthusiasm, passion or love makes little difference: it’s all the same to me. When I follow it, I am in the flow. The right situations, people, and resources come forward. I am following what Joseph Campbell called “my bliss.”
When I swim upstream, I make little progress, and I expend unneeded energy. But when I go with the flow I follow my soul’s calling. I live my life on purpose and with purpose.
This is my manifesto for living. I share it with you, my neighbors, because I want you to hold me accountable to it. Through it, I will live a rich and abundant life.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 29, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
CNN had an in-studio interview with a petroleum industry analyst this morning. His matter-of-fact report of the following offers important tips for each of us to act on right away.
Also, I just spoke with my buddy who owns the BP station in downtown Atlanta. He told me that he expects fuel pump prices to rise to $4.50-$5.00 per gallon for REGULAR gas by the end of the week and stay there for a while. For Georgians, this does not take into account the temprorary state fuel tax exemption that ends on September 30 (next week). Unless the legislature commits to another emergency session, we have to brace for very high prices.
What you can do.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 23, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
EDITOR'S NOTE: The Body Politic searches for the best, most cogent commentary on urgent matters. Today we bring you the following transcript of Bob Shieffer's closing comments on the September 4 edition of "CBS Face the Nation":
"We have come through what may have been one of the worst weeks in America's history -- a week in which government at every level failed the people it was created to serve.
There is no purpose for government except to improve the lives of its citizens. Yet, as scenes of horror that seem to be coming from some Third World country flash before us, official Washington was like a dog watching television. It saw the lights and images but did not seem to comprehend their meaning or see any link to reality.
As the flood waters rose, local officials in New Orleans ordered the city evacuated; they might have well told their citizens to fly to the moon. How do you evacuate when you don't have a car? No hint of intelligent design in any of this. This was just survival of the richest.
By mid-week, a parade of Washington officials rushed before the cameras to urge patience -- what good is patience to a mother who can't find food and water for a dehydrated child?
Washington was coming out of an August vacation stupor and unable to refocus on business, or even think straight. Why else would Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert question aloud whether New Orleans should even be rebuilt, and when he was unable to get to Washington on time to vote on emergency aid funds, Hastert had an excuse only Washington could understand -- he had to attend a fund-raiser back home.
Since 9/11, Washington has spent years and untold billions reorganizing the government to deal with crises brought on by possible terrorist attacks. If this is the result, we had better start over."
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 07, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." --- Buckminster Fuller
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 03, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The latest, mind-boggling insult to storm ravaged New Orleans, Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert says the country should NOT rebuild this city, one of our nation's cultural jewels. Here's the article: http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_Times-Picayune/archives/2005_09.html#075833.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 01, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
EDITOR'S NOTE: The Body Politic searches for the best, most cogent commentary on urgent matters. Today we bring you the following by William Rivers Pitt of Truthout.org. He provides the best deconstruction of the Katrina disaster.
THE WAKE OF THE FLOOD
By William Rivers Pitt, a t r u t h o u t | Perspective
This will come as no surprise, but columnist Molly Ivins has again nailed it to the wall. "Government policies have real consequences in people's lives," Ivins wrote in her Thursday column. "This is not ‘just politics’ or blaming for political advantage. This is about the real consequences of what governments do and do not do about their responsibilities. And about who winds up paying the price for those policies."
Try this timeline on for size. In January of 2001, George W. Bush appointed Texas crony Joe Allbaugh to head FEMA, despite the fact that Allbaugh had exactly zero experience in disaster management. By April of 2001, the Bush administration announced that much of FEMA’s work would be privatized and downsized. Allbaugh that month described FEMA as, "an oversized entitlement program."
In December 2002, Allbaugh quit as head of FEMA to create a consulting firm whose purpose was to advise and assist companies looking to do business in occupied Iraq. He was replaced by Michael D. Brown, whose experience in disaster management was gathered while working as an estate-planning lawyer in Colorado, and while serving as counsel for the International Arabian Horse Association legal department. In other words, Bush chose back-to-back FEMA heads whose collective ability to work that position could fit inside a thimble with room to spare.
By March of 2003, FEMA was no longer a Cabinet-level position, and was folded into the Department of Homeland Security. It’s primary mission was recast towards fighting acts of terrorism. In June of 2004, the Army Corps of Engineers budget for levee construction in New Orleans was cut by a record $71.2 million. Jefferson Parish emergency management chiefs Walter Maestri said at the time, "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay."
And then the storm came, and the sea rose, and the levees failed. Filthy sewage-laced water began to fill the bowl of New Orleans. Tens of thousands of poor people who did not have the resources to flee the storm became trapped in a slowly deteriorating city without food, water or electricity. The entire nation has since been glued to their televisions, watching footage of an apocalyptic human tragedy unfold before their eyes.
Anyone who has put gasoline in their car since Tuesday has come to know what happens when the port that handles 40% of our national petroleum distribution becomes unusable. And the response? "Bush mugs for the cameras," says Kevin Drum of The Washington Monthly, "cuts a cake for John McCain, plays the guitar for Mark Wills, delivers an address about V-J day, and continues with his vacation. When he finally gets around to acknowledging the scope of the unfolding disaster, he delivers only a photo op on Air Force One and aflat, defensive, laundry list speech in the Rose Garden."
Newsweek described it this way: "For all the president’s statements ahead of the hurricane, the region seemed woefully unprepared for the flooding of New Orleans - a catastrophe that has long been predicted by experts and politicians alike. There seems to have been no contingency planning for a total evacuation of the city, including the final refuges of the city’s Superdome and its hospitals. There were no supplies of food and water ready offshore - on Navy ships for instance - in the event of such flooding, even though government officials knew there were thousands of people stranded inside the sweltering and powerless city."
This is it, right here, right now. This is the Bush administration in a nutshell. The decision to invade Iraq based on lies has left the federal government’s budget woefully, and I daresay deliberately, unprepared for a disaster of this magnitude, despite the fact that decades worth of warnings have been put forth about what would happen to New Orleans should a storm like this hit. Louisiana National Guard soldiers and equipment, such as high-water Humvees for example, are sitting today in Iraq while hundreds or even thousands die because there are not enough hands to reach out and pull them from the water. FEMA – downsized, redirected, budget-slashed and incompetently led – has thus far failed utterly to cope with the scope of the catastrophe.
Actions have consequences. What you see on your television today is not some wild accident, but is a disaster that could have been averted had the priorities of this government been more in line with the needs of the people it pretends to serve. The city of New Orleans, home to so much of the culture that makes America unique and beautiful, is today drowning underneath an avalanche of polluted, diseased water. This, simply, did not have to happen.
Remember that the next time you hear Bush talk about noble causes, national priorities and responsibility. This has been an administration of death, disaster, fear and woe. The whole pack of them should be run out of Washington on a rail. Better yet, they should be air-dropped into the center of New Orleans and made to see and smell and touch and taste the newest disaster they have helped to create.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on September 01, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
President Bush happily picked guitar at one of his famous spin rallies yesterday before a typically cherry-picked audience in Colorado yesterday:
(click here for the Associated Press photo http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050830/480/capm10208301856)
Other U.S. Presidents, including his father, made a beeline for major U.S. disaster areas, but not this President. Apparently, the only disasters he appreciates are those he can leverage to invade other countries. The closest he has gotten to this disaster is a 20,000 foot fly-over. A FLY-BY.
It took him 3 days to realize the magnitude of this disaster even though it has had wall-to-wall coverage on CNN and all of the networks. (Of course, it took him 3 days to respond to the Indonesian tsunami, too... but this effected HIS constituents, HIS voters).
He is either woefully uninformed about the daily happenings in the lives of the people he serves or woefully callous. I'm not sure which is worse. And most of these people voted for him!! Now there's a big fat thank you.
Wide swatches of his beautiful Red States have been dropped through a worm hole to the 19th century. Lawlessness and devastation prevail. There's no fresh water, no electricity, no phone service, no mail service, no sanitation. The entire economic base of lower Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama has been eradicated. There's no tax base left to provide for recovery.
The death toll escalates with the rising flood waters.
Where's the National Guard -- DEPLOYED in Iraq. They were never supposed to leave this country exposed for so long.
Where's George? Safely in his cocoon, as usual.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on August 31, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
With conservative and liberal extremists entrenched in unworkable policy positions over Iraq ("stay the course" vs. "out now"), a cadre of independent journalists, congressional staffers and progressive political activists recently partnered to end the policy quagmire over Iraq and develop a new roadmap to peace. This "3rd Way" approach outlines a new set of options that:
The roadmap has been framed as a petition that is being pushed out to the American people today via grassroots action to give them the opportunity to review and ratify this new approach to U.S. involvement in Iraq. A link to the petition is provided below. In summary, it asks for:
You can read and sign the "People's Petition for an Iraq Peace Process" at: http://www.pdamerica.org/petition/iraq-withdraw-petition.php.
Posted by Kimberly Krautter on August 16, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments